Watson conversation better than Watson Natural language classifier? -


i created classifier in nlc after creating number of classes(intents) , few examples each class. classifier accuracy poor.

when used same training data in watson conversation service , tested it, intent identification accuracy good.

as understand conversation service uses nlc, why there such big difference in performance?

watson conversation not use nlc. have 2 different learning models. conversation works better natural language classification, while nlc text in general.

nlc takes longer build it's model vs conversation. take conversation few minutes, can take 30 minutes or more nlc.

lastly nlc uses called relative accuracy, while conversation uses absolute confidence.

to explain, imagine have 2 intents "cars" + "trains".

if ask nlc question, tell car or train, if question "what elephant?". confidences added add 100%.

conversation on other hand can understand question might not related @ trained on. can tell elephant not car, nor train.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

commonjs - How to write a typescript definition file for a node module that exports a function? -

consider, toml node module can use: // toml.d.ts declare module toml { export function parse(value:string):any; } declare module "toml" { export = toml; } then: /// <reference path="../../../../../defs/toml/toml.d.ts"/> import toml = require('toml'); toml.parse(...); however, node module export single function, such 'glob' ( https://github.com/isaacs/node-glob ). the node usage of module be: var glob = require("glob") glob("*.js", {}, callback(err, files) { ... }); you'd naively expect this: // glob.d.ts declare function globs(paths:string, options:any, callback:{(err:any, files:string[]):void; ...but because typescripts 'import' semantics bit strange, seems can use 'import .. = require()' statement alias modules . trying call: /// <reference path="../../../../../defs/glob/glob.d.ts"/> import blog = require('glob'); results in: error ts2072: mod
Read more

openid - Okta: Failed to get authorization code through API call -

i'm integrating okta own idp server using okta's api. i'm implementing authorization code flow following steps below: in own server, use /api/v1/authn endpoint sessiontoken. use sessiontoken obtain authorization calling endpoint: /oauth2/v1/authorize?client_id=" + clientid + "&sessiontoken=" + sessiontoken + "&response_type=code&response_mode=query&scope=openid&redirect_uri=" + redirecturl + "&state=evanyang&nonce=" it's supposed return response status code 302 , location header containing redirect url code value. however, keep getting response status code 200 , without location header, html body saying "you using unsupported browser." , "javascript disabled on browser." according api documentation: http://developer.okta.com/docs/api/resources/oidc.html#authentication-request , sessiontoken parameter sufficient this: an okta one-time sessiontoken. allows api-based
Read more

thorough guide for profiling racket code -

did googling ("racket profiling", "racket measure performance"), didn't find , there no examples in docs. did google "profile" search on htdp - no luck. (profile (f ...)) output isn't obvious other small snippets. ideally want python's python -m cprofile usage examples. when search "python profiling", both duckduckgo , google give top result: 26.4. python profilers . (although scanned quickly, seems more of reference "thorough usage guide" examples. if had else in mind, perhaps please link that?) the equivalent racket documentation be: profile: statistical profiler . a usage example: #lang racket (require profile) (profile-thunk (thunk (function-to-profile arg0 arg1) )) here (thunk e) convenience (lambda () e) . bigger example: #lang racket (module mod racket (provide f) (define (f) (for/list ([i 10000]) i))) (require (prefix-in mod: 'mod)) (define (f) (for ([i 10000
Read more